Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions
Posted by: GSM
Date/Time: 02/08/2004 18:21:59

"Once we have some ideas about what how questions work, and their utility/function, then their role might become more apparent in all those specific new code contexts. What do you think?"

I've no idea really Mark whether it would be fruitful to approach it this way or the from the context to start with - I'm open to any suggestions you have.

Questions seemed to lead to a focusing of thought do they not?  They make our minds concentrate on certain aspects of our experience?  What's interesting here? for example..

Now let's relate that to Whispering - language is seen as a form of f2 transforms and generating a set of belief filters that reduce the ongoing experience of the individual.  Do questions merely reflect the process of f2 transforms, or do they reflect a more natural questioning process inherent in mental process i.e. the verbal aspect questions is merely a f2 formating of the questioning process which is a natural process in its own right.  If so what are the implications of questions in terms of the know nothing state?


Entire Thread

TopicDate PostedPosted By
The quality of questions31/07/2004 19:24:49GSM
     Re:The quality of questions31/07/2004 22:49:25Robert Kamala
          Re:Re:The quality of questions01/08/2004 08:20:01GSM
               Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions02/08/2004 09:49:59Mark MacLean
                    Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions02/08/2004 10:12:36GSM
                         Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions02/08/2004 10:25:16Mark MacLean
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions02/08/2004 13:22:14GSM
                                   Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions02/08/2004 17:25:35Mark MacLean
                                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions02/08/2004 18:21:59GSM
                                             Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions03/08/2004 04:41:24Mark MacLean
                                                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions04/08/2004 10:35:21GSM
                                                       Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions05/08/2004 08:24:11Mark MacLean
                                                            Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions05/08/2004 16:26:11GSM
                                             Re:The quality of questions04/08/2004 15:25:18Greg Alexander
                                                  Re:Re:The quality of questions04/08/2004 15:37:22GSM
                                   Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions02/08/2004 22:28:37nj
                                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions04/08/2004 10:20:06GSM
                                             Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions04/08/2004 11:30:33nj
                                                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions04/08/2004 11:32:42GSM
                                                       Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions04/08/2004 11:54:19nj
                         Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions02/08/2004 21:51:05John Schertzer
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions04/08/2004 10:19:18GSM
               Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions02/08/2004 09:53:15Mark MacLean
                    Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions04/08/2004 10:25:00GSM
                         Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions05/08/2004 10:36:03Mark MacLean
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions05/08/2004 16:42:23GSM
                                   Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions06/08/2004 02:54:05Mark MacLean

Forum Home