| Topic: | Re:Re:Proposal for Refinement of distinction between modeling and applications |
| Posted by: | Robert |
| Date/Time: | 08/01/2003 19:55:41 |
|
John, what then be the difference between process and content distinctions? I can understand that there is one level of modeling which it dosnt matter if it is applyied to Grinder and Bandler doing modeling about Milton or the modeling done about Milton by those 2 men. What seems to be the issue here are your reference to the difference between process and content destinctions refered here as metaprograms. Do you fully tell us now that meta-programs as the model who been into NLP for 20 plus years isnt NLP model at all and should be disgarded? What would be a "verbal promt" since I have no reference at all to that word. If meta-programs are content destinctions then it seems like this, that when someone enter a uptime state where they have full acess to the sensorysystem that when someone ask them something they get associations to some representation which are the content destinctions they make about those representations. (How they acessing those representations would be the process destinctions) For me there seems to be some lack of knowledge here from our side. The background knowledge to relevant understand what you John propose about metaprograms and content process destinctions dosnt compute. (Make sense) If thats your intention that people shouldnt compute what you are writing as a demonstration of those same process and content destinctions then I would get it. So? /Robert |