Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:NLP Changework vs. Therapy and Coaching |
Posted by: | nj |
Date/Time: | 25/04/2003 03:39:21 |
Hello, KC. 1. You wrote, "Can you repackage your statement..." Yes. Any Science Of Representations is not part of an inevitable future. Have you ever heard the expressions, "This is my art!" or "I'm expressing myself!" from someone performing a behavior? Would you tell an artist that the future holds in store a Science Of Representations, a codification of aesthetic production processes and a codification of necessary aesthetic criteria for any artistic product? What might happen if you told an artist that? An artist might respond with paranoia, and produce more of her art before someone comes along and reduces that art to a product description and a model of production. An artist might cease her artistic endeavors. That artist would think that the Science Of Representations will only lead to easy duplication of or improvement on whatever art she could produce. An artist might abandon his aesthetic sense for the rationalization of aesthetic sense that the new science provides him. How damning your motivation process might be for someone who already feels compelled to produce art. My restatement, KC, is: "If you are an artist, scientist or researcher, you can create the art you want to find in the future. The future won't force you to produce art you don't want to produce." In the future, the only Science Of Representations (for you) could be your own. -nj |