Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:NLP Changework vs. Therapy and Coaching |
Posted by: | John Schertzer |
Date/Time: | 29/04/2003 15:55:10 |
nj, Reading back over your posts, I believe we have different equivalences to the word "science" and all that it implies. I may have been misreading you a bit as well, in my assumption that you imagine a science of reps would mean a standardization of the art process and/or product. As for your earlier statement: "Technology and it's products don't happen to researchers. Researchers can create future technologies by those researchers choosing what they want the future to include." I would only disagree, now that we've had this discussion, that either researchers or artists can specifically choose what they want the future to include. I believe accident and discovery play very important roles all the way through. My experience/observation is that what we end up with is something analogous to what our initial outcomes may have been. The process of research develops products, but alters context as well. What we want the future to include may not be appropriate when the time comes. best, JS |