| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Bandler and nested loops |
| Posted by: | Gabriel |
| Date/Time: | 08/09/2003 02:57:34 |
|
Cool! I believe you. Yet this probably is from at least ten years ago or more. Or written by someone other than Bandler. And remember Bandler never goes by the manual on his trainings. I said the article was not accurate, I didn't say it was totally wrong. More importantly I was concern about the article miss quoting Bandler about Grinder... or more accuretly "sort of" quoting which is absolutely not the case. Besides what he does with the nesting loops is far more than chaining states. Yet it can be used for that purpose and in that specific case you could even have breaker states in it, not that I would, but you could. And in the end you are right, Bandler does not always "have" five loops... usually is a lot more. he might only teach that many but he has a lot more going on. Anyway, thanks for your post. BUT lets all remember this is not a Bandler site, and IT IS about WITW. Be well Gabriel Guerrero |