Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Modeling and NLP |
Posted by: | Pete West |
Date/Time: | 07/11/2003 14:38:29 |
Hello Todd, You wrote, "The Tabb games were used in many contexts of language and other sensory type 'problems' as well. It's rich with possibilities for NLP." My response is piqued. I (and I imagine others) would be most interested in any detailed description (time permitting of course) which you are willing/able to offer in reference to the above passage… Please excuse my (generic) meta-model challenges to it: In which contexts of language and other sensory type "problems" were the Tabb games used in your experience? When exactly and by whom specifically were the Tabb games used? With which sensory type "problems" were they used in your experience? Other than (possibly) what I'm presently presenting to you, what is a specific example of a 'language problem' to which Tabb games were applied in the above context? In other words, illustrate your reference experience with Dr.Tabb and his games if you don’t mind. Your answers to these questions are important to me, especially if your claim that, "It's (Tabb games are) rich with possibilities for NLP" has any truth-value to it...since the ongoing development of NLP is important to me. BTW, I have an eye exam with Dr.Tabb this coming Monday (he’s my Optometrist) and I’m curious if you (or others) have any precisely formulated questions which you might like an answer for from him. If this or any other question seems (to you ) to be inappropriate/unethical, then I invite you to consider the following: "(2) The list of rules that define what you are against ARE A PRODUCT OF a process of weighing interests of those participants effected by your rules." -nj Is this 'process of weighing interests of those...effected by your rules' always a necessarily ill-formed and distorted process involving ‘mind-reading’? Is ethical therapy (content free therapy) indeed possible or is ethical behavior simply rule-governed behavior where every rule has an eventual exception? -Pete Sorry Ken, I’ve drifted off course. Your final two questions re. NLPmodeling and 6-step reframe and eye accessing cues are puzzling to me and at this time step, I’m unable to recommend solutions for them. |