| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Difference in beliefs as a case of differences in perception |
| Posted by: | Charlie |
| Date/Time: | 19/05/2004 12:37:57 |
|
- Just because you eat the meat, you are not factoryfarm employee; you aren't responsible for the animal's torture. But are you a willing participant in the death of animals for consumption of their flesh? - the meat in the cooler is just meat, the animal is long dead. - what can one person who doesn't eat meat do? (see argument above) see above. - meat adds variety and flavor to my meals So do potatoes? As I said, myself I eat meat - what I'm trying to understand is how meat eating is congruent for a person who identifies with other beings on level of F1 experience. Is there some universality implied in First Access? Cuz sure as shit the bull being castrated sees something else dude. The discrimination between what you care to identify with and the things you don't, is that a worthwhile basis for ethical conclusions? Is that what we've got ethically? |