Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Thnk you for whispering |
Posted by: | John Grinder |
Date/Time: | 03/10/2002 20:09:20 |
Dear Pam, Jim, Robert May I suggest that it is entirely inappropriate to give advice (here on this website or anywhere else for that matter)? I happen to recognize intelligence in the various content suggestions the three of you have made to Sabine - further, I am certain that the advice you are offering is exactly what you would need if you were Sabine. However none of you are Sabine and never will be, so let's put the ethics of NLP into play right here on this website and offer metaphors, process instructions... but please no content advice. If my posting is unclear, please have a look at comments beginning on page 153, again page 158, page 214, page 308... in Whispering. Please keep in mind that good intentions are not sufficient for a professional - having the ability to make the ethical distinctions that are required certainly moves us closer to our desired outcome. All the best, John |
Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
Thnk you for whispering | 03/10/2002 01:42:30 | Sabine |
Re:Thnk you for whispering | 03/10/2002 02:23:24 | Robert Holzhauser |
Re:Thnk you for whispering | 03/10/2002 14:37:04 | Jim R |
Re:Re:Thnk you for whispering | 03/10/2002 18:28:40 | Pam |
Re:Re:Re:Thnk you for whispering | 03/10/2002 20:09:20 | John Grinder |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Thnk you for whispering | 03/10/2002 22:12:49 | Pam |
Re:Thnk you for whispering | 03/10/2002 17:55:24 | John Grinder and Carmen Bostic St. Clair |
Re:Re:Thank you for whispering | 05/10/2002 00:05:27 | Sabine |