| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Cognitive Science, FA and |
| Posted by: | John Schertzer |
| Date/Time: | 12/02/2003 15:53:48 |
|
See this is where I believe you and Michael Hall miss the boat. While it may be useful to draw on cog sci at times, NLP and cog sci are really like oil and water and should not be mentioned on the same day. There are those who are so grounded in cog sci and statistical psychology (an attempt to make one of the "humanities" a hard science -- not!), that they can't understand how something like FA is a conceptual tool (useful fiction)and that their own learnings, ie cog sci believes there is no pure FA, are both based on different sets of mapping aesthetics, since pure conjecture based on observation and that based on scientific are really different logical types, as are cog sci and nlp. best, J |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Cognitive Science, FA and | 09/02/2003 20:07:39 | Lewis Walker |
| Re:Cognitive Science, FA and | 10/02/2003 00:09:19 | Robert |
| Re:Re:Cognitive Science, FA and | 10/02/2003 18:36:09 | Lewis Walker |
| Re:Cognitive Science, FA and | 10/02/2003 00:42:17 | Jon Edwards |
| Re:Re:Cognitive Science, FA and | 10/02/2003 18:46:15 | Lewis Walker |
| Re:Re:Re:Cognitive Science, FA and | 11/02/2003 09:40:53 | Jon Edwards |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Cognitive Science, FA and | 11/02/2003 14:42:55 | Lewis Walker |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Cognitive Science, FA and | 11/02/2003 20:09:08 | Jon Edwards |
| Re:Cognitive Science, FA and | 10/02/2003 17:24:27 | Patrick E.C. Merlevede, MSc. (jobEQ.com) |
| Re:Re:Cognitive Science, FA and | 10/02/2003 18:39:30 | John Grinder |
| Re:Re:Re:Cognitive Science, FA and | 10/02/2003 20:46:52 | Patrick E.C. Merlevede, MSc. (jobEQ.com) |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Cognitive Science, FA and | 11/02/2003 02:20:50 | Michael Carroll |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Cognitive Science, FA and | 11/02/2003 05:11:49 | Patrick E.C. Merlevede, MSc. (jobEQ.com) |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Cognitive Science, FA and | 11/02/2003 17:14:02 | Michael Carroll |
| Re:Re:Cognitive Science, FA and | 10/02/2003 18:52:48 | Lewis Walker |
| Re:Re:Re:Cognitive Science, FA and | 10/02/2003 20:51:42 | Patrick E.C. Merlevede, MSc. (jobEQ.com) |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Cognitive Science, FA and | 12/02/2003 13:40:36 | Suds |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Cognitive Science, FA and | 12/02/2003 15:07:59 | Joe Tish |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Cognitive Science, FA and | 12/02/2003 15:21:07 | Patrick E.C. Merlevede, MSc. (jobEQ.com) |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Cognitive Science, FA and | 12/02/2003 15:53:48 | John Schertzer |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Cognitive Science, FA and | 12/02/2003 15:54:16 | John Schertzer |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Cognitive Science, FA and | 12/02/2003 19:13:24 | John Grinder |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Cognitive Science, FA and | 13/02/2003 20:31:06 | nj |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Cognitive Science, FA and | 12/02/2003 18:19:22 | John Grinder |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Cognitive Science, FA and | 14/02/2003 18:06:56 | suds |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Cognitive Science, FA and | 14/02/2003 18:45:39 | John Grinder |