| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dilts Logical Levels! (pseudo-science) |
| Posted by: | John Schertzer |
| Date/Time: | 26/08/2003 14:20:03 |
|
Shelly, My point is that to speak is already to begin the division process. Science plays the objectivity game because it's useful, but it was actually physicists who taught social scientists that there is no real duality between observer and observed. I was just trying to point out that Ryan was practicing the same fallacy he was accusing scientists of making, and in doing so he was also making a great example of how difficult it is to not practice that black art that he accused "scientists" of practicing. But I'm also not convinced that Mars is part of my nervous system. Nor that there is a Mars or that I have a nervous system. And that's where your argument eventually leads, so how about some relative *objectivity* so that people can have a conversation? Let people have their "out there" since there may be no other art (or useful fiction) that accomplishes what they feel they need to do. best, JS |