| Topic: | Reality / Ethics |
| Posted by: | Eric |
| Date/Time: | 16/10/2003 16:51:36 |
|
Hi John, You've made a claim that there is no objective reality, rather simply many different perceptual filters of the world. Elements of Buddhism and Hinduism share this view. They also share a perspective than based on the filters a person has and/or the actions they take, that a person attracts all the things that occurr to them both good and bad. And that there are no neutral causes, only things that a person attracts. Do you share this view? Also, if such a thing is true, would that allow us to give up the "no content" rule of ethics you have presented since "the other person is attracting the behavior anyway". Eric |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Reality / Ethics | 16/10/2003 16:51:36 | Eric |
| Re:Reality / Ethics | 16/10/2003 17:56:43 | John Grinder |
| Re:Re:Reality / Ethics | 16/10/2003 18:38:58 | Eric |
| Re:Re:Re:Reality / Ethics | 16/10/2003 22:29:50 | nj |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Reality / Ethics | 17/10/2003 05:12:02 | nj |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Reality / Ethics | 24/10/2003 13:07:18 | Eric |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reality / Ethics | 24/10/2003 13:41:07 | Suds |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reality / Ethics | 25/10/2003 09:10:08 | nj |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reality / Ethics | 25/10/2003 22:51:10 | Lewis Walker |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reality / Ethics | 26/10/2003 00:11:40 | nj |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reality / Ethics | 26/10/2003 18:41:01 | Lewis Walker |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reality / Ethics | 27/10/2003 04:41:41 | nj |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reality / Ethics | 27/10/2003 12:00:32 | Lewis Walker |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reality / Ethics | 28/10/2003 01:13:55 | Eric |
| Re:Re:Reality / Ethics | 16/10/2003 22:16:06 | nj |
| Re:Re:Reality / Ethics | 23/10/2003 05:07:57 | carrie |
| Re:Re:Re:Reality / Ethics | 23/10/2003 17:49:44 | John Grinder |