Topic: | Re:Re:Re:ethical milton and grinder |
Posted by: | soren |
Date/Time: | 08/11/2003 05:29:35 |
I can lift over 8 examples of people asking for Dr. Grinder's opinion very nicely- examples from this list. Do you really want me to go back and show you these? It's amazing, but it isn't surprising that Grinder doesn't want to address this issue. He will eventually speak sarcastically to the issue, I'm sure. But, really, go back and see how a few different folks have phrased their question. I don't share their question because I have no interest in the ethical question as framed within the NLP context; it doesn't stand out to me for some reason. But I am interested in how Grinder relates the ethical formulation of WITW with the content introduction of Milton Erickson. I've been a big fan of Milton's work so I think that is why I'm interested in this particular question: here comes #9 ( and, yes, it is funny) Dr. Grinder what is your impression of Milton Erickson's work within the context of the ethical principals you propose with CArman St. Claire in your book? |