Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:ethical milton and grinder |
Posted by: | Wolfgang |
Date/Time: | 08/11/2003 22:54:53 |
Hi, ng, I wrote: "Ethics is a content issue and thus not subject to NLP though inevitable subject to personal application of NLP (which is a difference)." You wrote: "What do you mean by "content issue", Wolfgang?" I write: I mean, that "ethics" (standards of acting) is no observable process variable but a subjective interpretation and evaluation of specific behaviors that may and will differ according to the personal, cultural or social context you īre in or the values you share. What might be "ethical" for you, might be "unethical" for me or even not worth thinking about for the people of greenland. You might have your "rules how to act" when applying NLP and I might have mine and someone else might have even different ones - according to their own "ethics". We could even argue, who is right or wrong. But thats not part of NLP but part of our own neurosis ;-) Hope I could clear it up (being not a native speaker of the english language). Wolfgang |