| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:ethical milton and grinder |
| Posted by: | nj |
| Date/Time: | 08/11/2003 07:18:19 |
|
Hello, Soren. You wrote: 1. "I can lift over 8 examples of people asking for Dr. Grinder's opinion very nicely- examples from this list. Do you really want me to go back and show you these?" Sure, why not. Prepare to defend your claims that each question was asked nicely, given the post context in which each question was presented, because, if you present the questions, someone might challenge your claim about each question. But first, you might want to show some commitment to sorting out the supporting evidence for your claims about those questions. Soren, you wrote: 2. "It's amazing, but it isn't surprising [...] He will eventually speak sarcastically [...] I don't share their question [...] I have no interest in the ethical question [...] it doesn't stand out to me [...]. But [...] I've been a big fan of Milton's work" Soren, given how I edited the content of your post's statements, in my quote (2), do you think, if Dr. Grinder were to read quote (2), instead of the post it quotes from, that Dr. Grinder would correctly interpret your intention in asking the question in my quote (3), if he were to read quote (3), after he read quote (2)? 3. "Dr. Grinder what is your impression of Milton Erickson's work within the context of the ethical principals you propose with CArman St. Claire in your book?" -nj ps: Are you interested in discussing ethics with me, Soren? I would like to discuss ethics with you, if you're interested. |