Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:6 step reframe |
Posted by: | John Schertzer |
Date/Time: | 30/12/2002 14:15:01 |
Yes, thanx on all counts, especially the word on calibration. I find that when I am tuned in, particularly to the point where I am mimicking the subject inwardly (going in and out of second pos), I seem to "intuitively" make better decisions about what to do. And I believe at that point the yes/no signal is there implicitly, along with an array of other involuntary signals, which I'm only peripherally aware of. But it's also good to make a conscious check of these things, since further training is always implicit in application. I will refer back to the thread you mentioned... best, JS |
Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
6 step reframe | 15/12/2002 23:39:57 | Lewis Walker |
Re:6 step reframe | 16/12/2002 02:53:05 | Carmen Bostic St. Clair and John Grinder |
Re:6 step reframe | 18/12/2002 00:57:45 | Michael Carroll |
Re:Re:6 step reframe | 18/12/2002 01:44:26 | thepropagandist |
Re:Re:Re:6 step reframe | 18/12/2002 16:48:55 | Michael Caroll |
Re:6 step reframe | 24/12/2002 17:43:41 | John Schertzer |
Re:Re:6 step reframe | 24/12/2002 19:11:52 | John Grinder |
Re:Re:Re:6 step reframe | 25/12/2002 00:29:07 | Michael Carroll |
Re:Re:Re:Re:6 step reframe | 25/12/2002 04:40:09 | SMH |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:6 step reframe | 26/12/2002 18:12:12 | John Schertzer |
Re:Re:Re:Re:6 step reframe | 26/12/2002 18:09:48 | John Schertzer |
Re:Re:Re:6 step reframe | 26/12/2002 17:56:53 | John Schertzer |
Re:Re:Re:Re:6 step reframe | 26/12/2002 18:58:51 | John Grinder |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:6 step reframe | 26/12/2002 19:52:43 | John Schertzer |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:6 step reframe | 26/12/2002 22:57:29 | John Grinder |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:6 step reframe | 27/12/2002 14:18:59 | John Schertzer |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:6 step reframe | 27/12/2002 21:28:50 | John Grinder |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:6 step reframe | 30/12/2002 14:15:01 | John Schertzer |