| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dilts Logical Levels! (pseudo-science) |
| Posted by: | Stephen Bray |
| Date/Time: | 27/08/2003 18:14:46 |
|
John S, No I don't think you're begging anything here. New Code is a model isn't it. To treat it as 'reality' would be like claiming that because we don't know if chickens or eggs come first, then time has ceased to exist. Indeed if the boundaries between F1, First Access and F2, (according to the WITW model) were not permeable our mind would be composed of three closed chambers and in the absence of feedback from each other would not be viable. That's my take on the subject. It's like Erickson would say: "You have a conscious mind, and an unconscious mind". But I think really I have one mind and it's quite efficiently forgetful and that enables something that I call me to enjoy writing to you without me having to attend to my digestion or growing my toe nails. But for therapeutic purposes Erickson's sentence is surely easier to utilise than my concept. Neither Erickson's idea, or mine, or New Code is real, its just that each is useful, according to the context. I still like t's question though, and my earlier post was simply a clarification of what I understood John and Carmen to have written in WITW. I am certainly paying far more attention to the issue of coding as defined in WITW since reading the book, even though I also enjoy reading Lacan. Best, Stephen |