Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Mission, Purpose etc |
Posted by: | Johnn Grinder |
Date/Time: | 09/06/2003 16:42:12 |
Hi Spike Well, first of all, let's agree that all counsel (or as you say, advice) is the advice giver talking to him or herself, what he or she would do were they the other party (the receiving party). If there is something in such reflexive pronouncements, great, go for it. Otherwise... They passage I quote in the "advice" is Castenada's advice - from which I have gleaned positive experiences. Your "paraphrase" is not a paraphrase - it is an interpretation. Indeed, I disagree with the second of your interpretations entirely. Living in the future is as absurd as living in the past. You wrote, "...pages 334 to 344, where you and Bostic st Clair point to the fact that there are no formal characteristics defining the process/content distinction..." This is not what Carmen and I presented in the pages cited - what we did propose is that the process/content (form/substance) distinction is essential as one of the key differentiator which distinguishes NLP application from all other (known to us) otherwise comparable systems. What we did point out in some detail is the we were not successful in developing a satisfactory formal definition. Further, while we offer a series of clear examples of each term in the distinction, we propose that is is critical to develop such a formal distinction - a puzzle we elucidated and invited the NLP community to get involved in pursuit of this formal distinction. Do you have a proposal or suggestion? Finally, you wrote, "...seem to say that it is a relational quality, so that content is content in relation to something, and the same goes for process..." Lost me here - could you elaborate and offer a concrete example? All the best, John |
Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
Mission, Purpose etc | 18/05/2003 13:09:50 | Jane |
Re:Mission, Purpose etc | 20/05/2003 18:22:31 | John Grinder |
Re:Re:Mission, Purpose etc | 21/05/2003 17:07:24 | Jane |
Re:Re:Re:Mission, Purpose etc | 21/05/2003 19:09:06 | John Grinder |
Student of Everything.....Master of Nothing..... | 21/05/2003 20:34:16 | Mark MacLean |
Re:Student of Everything.....Master of Nothing..... | 27/05/2003 20:06:32 | John Grinder |
Postmodernism | 28/05/2003 17:10:15 | Golf Swing Modeler |
Re:Postmodernism | 28/05/2003 18:30:14 | John Grinder |
Re:Re:Postmodernism | 28/05/2003 22:11:47 | Golf Swing Modeler |
Re:Re:Re:Postmodernism | 29/05/2003 12:06:32 | Michael Carroll |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Postmodernism | 29/05/2003 12:21:58 | Golf Swing Modeler |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Postmodernism | 29/05/2003 16:49:40 | John Schertzer |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Postmodernism | 29/05/2003 16:52:42 | Golf Swing Modeler |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Postmodernism | 29/05/2003 17:20:34 | John Schertzer |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Postmodernism | 29/05/2003 18:15:10 | Golf Swing Modeler |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Postmodernism | 29/05/2003 19:13:29 | John Schertzer |
Re:Re:Student of Everything.....Master of Nothing..... | 05/06/2003 23:52:47 | Mark MacLean |
Re:Re:Re:Student of Everything.....Master of Nothing..... | 06/06/2003 03:08:51 | John Grinder |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Student of Everything.....Master of Nothing..... | 06/06/2003 14:16:13 | John Schertzer |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Student of Everything.....Master of Nothing..... | 06/06/2003 19:50:17 | Mark MacLean |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Student of Everything.....Master of Nothing..... | 06/06/2003 20:06:10 | John Schertzer |
Mission, Purpose etc | 22/05/2003 03:40:10 | thepropagandist |
Re:Mission, Purpose etc | 27/05/2003 21:01:46 | John Schertzer |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Mission, Purpose etc | 09/06/2003 03:49:35 | Spike |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Mission, Purpose etc | 09/06/2003 16:42:12 | Johnn Grinder |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Mission, Purpose etc | 13/06/2003 03:08:17 | Spike |