Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Neuro-logical levels |
Posted by: | GSM |
Date/Time: | 20/12/2003 20:47:16 |
JG wrote: "Otherwise, your proposal is vacuous." I think that's a bit harsh (personally - don't ask me to define what I mean by that). Its O.K. for someone to propose a paradigm for further exploration without giving an coherant explication of that proposal for it to have any worth. You could look further into the suggested area of investigation yourself. There is a degree of time involved in making an explication, to a rather much greater order than suggesting the proposal is crap. The degree of time to generate a coherant explication probably is not applicable for the current situation. How long did you take to explicate your models and how much did you charge (financially) for that effort? |