| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:ethics |
| Posted by: | Eric Bollinger |
| Date/Time: | 22/10/2003 14:44:38 |
|
Matt, Ericson was a great therapist. I doubt you are very good at all. Look, if you don't have the skill to do pure process work like Dr. Grinder, then keep your content to yourself and all the poor souls that have to put up with it. You obviously don't understand six-step reframing or sales and you probably have no real reason to be posing questions on a list full of people who understand the difference between content and process. When I read that you thought Erickson used content, I knew you didn't know anything. Erickson, for your information, only worked with the unconscious. Anything he said that sounded like content was really deep communication patterns with unconscious process. You probably don't understand that, but let me just say- it sounds like the work you do with clients is the opposite of Erickson. And isn't it obvious that Dr. Grinder considers Erickson to be an ethical therapist? Yes, it is. So you can just assume that Grinder doesn't believe that Erickson used content like you say. Eric Bolllinger |