| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:ethics (metaphor) |
| Posted by: | John Grinder |
| Date/Time: | 24/10/2003 08:27:37 |
|
carrie I certainly understand the state of having a conguent kinesthetic response to something and not having the capacity at that same moment (or for some time afterwards) to translate that feeling into language. Just so the task is clear (should you choose to accept this mission...) when you propose, "...a balence between process and content is the most important aspect of the therapeutic interaction..." you are signing up for the task of making the following distinctions: Which balance between proces and content? Is all content acceptable and only some, and what's the distinction between them? Does context play a role in determining the "balance of process and content"? etc John |