| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:First Access Revisited |
| Posted by: | nj |
| Date/Time: | 25/06/2003 05:40:35 |
|
Hello, Dr. Grinder. 1. You wrote, in your post 24/06/2003 22:48:53, to thread "Epistemological Corrections in Simple Speak Please :-)))", "I was thinking that here would be a very strong test of the limits (possibly) of anchoring. Use Synder's TM machine to induce the altered state ...". That is not the NLP I know right now, no it isn't. Applications can be different than traditional practice, what you wrote about there would probably be a horror. Stick with traditional practice, use yourself, in person, to create your client's state. 2. You wrote, in your post 22/06/2003 19:00:12, to thread "First Access", "Wow, so, I should never have done the research and generated the knowledge now called NLP?" And now that you have... you can choose what to do next. Sometimes the only way to ensure you're doing the right thing about a future context is to avoid it entirely. And your current approach, even if it's only written, is not what I expected you to write. Perhaps you think that you can take what's bad elsewhere and find good uses for it through your research. 3. You wrote, in your post 24/06/2003 22:48:53, to thread "Epistemological Corrections in Simple Speak Please :-)))", "Remove the TM machine..." You wrote, "remove the TM machine", so you can do your work after use of it. You want people to have the capabilities that this machine would, as you might term it, "unlock". You just anchor, and then you've accomplished your goal. The client doesn't need the machine any more. But it's not a good thing, Dr. Grinder. Who knows if your proposal would work, but meanwhile, the proposed process is dehumanizing, it's scary, it definitely doesn't meet your criterion of letting the client experience themselves as the source of the changework - you introduced that criterion as yours in a part of your book "Whispering In The Wind", yes you did. So please, please apply that criterion, and please stop encouraging research into this TM machine. -nj |