| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:First Access Revisited |
| Posted by: | John Grinder |
| Date/Time: | 14/10/2003 01:28:04 |
|
nj The questions you ask suggest to me that a re-read of Whispering would be useful in so far as the distinctions that are confusing to you are well handled there. If there are still questions, after the re-read, please present them to me and I will attempt to clarify: Example 1, you identify f2 transforms with language - however this is only a portion of the f2 transforms. Consider the visual virtuosity of an architect or the deep kinesthetic thinking of a well-trained athlete or the composer in mid-composition. Example 2, the suspension of all f2 transforms does not imply any change in the f1 transforms - they continue to function as usual - which includes the functional application of the logics (primarily inductive) of the set f1. At any rate, let me know what is left after the re-read. John |