Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:First Access Revisited |
Posted by: | John Grinder |
Date/Time: | 15/10/2003 16:30:00 |
nj Interpretable as in "I had concluded that the concept termed "f2 transforms", is interpretable from what you wrote in your example" does not imply interpreted properly. The difficulty is with your interpretation as in, "I interpreted quote (1) to imply the following objective connotation for "f2 transforms": (2) internal computation and internal state as experienced in all sensory systems at all times" and "(4) the set f2 contains all internal computation performances and internal state experiences" Specify for yourself the verb "experience" in your interpretation and have another look at pages 9 - 49. The set of f2 transforms does not contain the f1 transforms - they are distinct, each with their own logics. What in the world could the phrase "objective connotation" possibly mean? All the |